Black Pigeon Speaks Shaun Chess Game

27.12.2020 admin

He's a hardcore conspiracy theorist (Rothchilds own the Fed), race-realist (country's economic success or failure is not a product of their economic policy but their race), ethno-nationalist (dogwhisles his support for turning the US into white ethnostate), authoritarian (pasionately supports Orban in his Soros witchhunt) misogynist (I don't use this word very often, but he's, he literarly. In the novel, Kronsteen is champion of Moscow for two years in a row and is playing in the championship tournament for his third year. In the novel, the chess game was described as a Queen's Gambit Declined, Meran Variation (1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nf3 c6 5.e3 Nbd7 6.Bd3 dxc4 7.Bxc4 b5 Bd3).

Game Pigeon Chess
Cached
Black Pigeon Speaks Shaun Chess Game Today
See Full List On Rationalwiki.org

“Never play chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are the bird is just going to shit on the board and act like it won anyway.”

In the ground breaking sitcom, All In The Family, the lead protagonist is Archie Bunker. Bunker is a dull-witted, but charismatic buffoon prone to frequent displays of malapropisms (look it up), ill-reasoned arguments, aspirations of grandiosity combined with a woeful ignorance of the dynamism of the real world around him. His arguments are disjointed and broken streams of logic held together with the glue of misguided indignation, which gives his ideas the feel of authentic pragmatism. As show creator Norman Lear often shows us, the reverse is true.

Such are the arguments posed by fellow columnist and You Tuber Mumia Obsidian Ali. In his latest slip-shod rebuttal to my previous article “Brenda Got A Big Ole Butt,” he attempts a paltry response by using a literal definition of words to combat my analysis of a common occurrence between black men and women throughout Urban America.

This is a continuing salvo in the discussion concerning select and non-select men. So let us dispense with the superfluous preliminaries and get right down to the BRASS TAX shall we?

INTRODUCTION TO LANGUAGE ARTS

His initial point is to claim that I was proven wrong on my article “Yes! There is a Such Thing as a NON-SELECT GUY TAX!” To disprove these unsound ramblings, one need go no further than the response written on HIS own column by one Ras EL which reads:

“WTF??!! Am I crazy? Nigga yall both right. You’re playing semantical acrobatics with the word “TAx” and over engineering the whole thesis my nigga. What the fuck is the difference? Tax or Fee. My guy is using “Taxed”as a rhetorical concept and you made a whole bullshit argument about it being a fee, not a TAx because “Black Women” are in no position to…”

Apparently, his readers grasp the significance of the argument even if he can’t seem to quite get it. But nevertheless here we go. The argument goes something like this: A tax is compulsory, if you are not required to pay it, then, it is not a tax. This Bunkerian reasoning process is an appallingly misinformed application of the term. It is also evidence of a gross ignorance of not only taxes, but everyday common sense.

FOR EXAMPLE: Income Tax in America is compulsory only for those who earn taxable income. Those who make money under the table, receive some forms of retirement or disability pensions, or are unemployed, are not required to FILE OR PAY TAXES. So is INCOME TAX COMPULSORY? IS IT STILL A TAX? Secondly, Capital Gains Tax is compulsory only for those who make a profit on the sale of non inventory assets. IS THAT A TAX? It is for those who fall within the requirements. And that was the point in the first place. He further attempts to use my words to undercut the argument. But my aforementioned words were based on the examples stated above. This rebuttal and his un-reasoned counterarguments are evidence of the fact that he has never heard of a metaphor. But never fear, i’ll even define it…lol

Metaphor: a figure of speech in which a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable. Or, a thing regarded as representative or symbolic of something else, especially something abstract.

While i’m accused of conceding my own argument, it is actually he who has bayoneted his own argument. He states as follows:

“Along comes Henry, who is interested in Big Booty Brenda as well, but is almost the exact opposite of D’Andre – he’s not “street”, tall, buff and is in fact kinda “lame and corny”. She really ain’t feeling all the ‘gina tingles that she feels when around D’Andre, but the fact of the matter is that D’Andre is kinda broke, whereas Henry more than makes up for his lack of overt physical prowess and appeal by being seriously successful, to say nothing of being kind and courteous – while D’Andre is something of a self-absorbed jerk…” Yes! He actually wrote this. While trying to disprove my argument, he actually corroborates it. HENRY COMPENSATES for his lack of physical prowess by being successful(Money). So why would Henry’s success be a consideration if he didn’t have to compensate? Non-Select Guy Tax Anyone?

Game Pigeon Chess

He also argues that I was proven wrong about the existence of a Big Booty Cartel. This is based on the fact that the body type that he and most black men are attracted to is not usually found in suburban communities. They are, in fact, women most commonly found in Urban America. (The Hood) This fact is axiomatic to the most casual observer; unless your name is Mumia Obsidian Ali. With over 46% of our community in the working class to poverty strata of the society, is it probable that Big Booty Brenda will be found in the hood? I know what you are saying. That’s a silly question right? Somebody should give Mr. Ali that memo because he either doesn’t know it, or won’t accept it. Or, maybe he is just flat out disingenuous. It is also axiomatic that in economically deprived neighborhoods, these women are more often than not: single mothers, promiscuous, dysfunctional and involved in destructive relationships with incompetent, semi-literate, aggressive men that they find sexually attractive.

WHY SHE WILL FUCK HIM RIGHT AWAY BUT NOT YOU!

So why would he dispute a generally known and accepted fact. Here is why! Because Big Booty Brenda’s rejection is a self-fulfilling prophesy of a lack of physical attraction on the open dating market in Black America. Her sexual selection, as problematic, short-sighted and catastrophic as it is, is logical in the context of everyday Black America.

According to statistical data from the US DOJ Bureau of Justice Statistics (1994-2010) (revisited in 2013), black women from the age of 12 years old experience higher rates of violence and sexual molestation than other females. So it is such a stretch of imagination that they would be attracted to men with the appearance of aggression? Whether this is actually true or not is immaterial. What is true is that this is their perception of real masculinity. It also forms the basis of what they determine to be sexually desirable. Concurrent with this trauma is the age old fixation with the bad boy/rebel angle prevalent in their earliest years of adulthood. Among these women, intelligence is no substitute for the presence of genuine masculine aggression. This intangible is generally not found in the Obsidians. When faced with these factors in the open dating market, the Obsidians and men of their ilk fall tragically short. (NO! THAT’S NOT AN AD-HOMINEM!) So they will initially choose him (Look down)

LANGUAGE ARTS 101

Right of First Refusal is a provision in a contract that allows a purchaser to buy a piece property before the seller negotiates a certain offer. AND NOW A SIMPLE EXPLANATION FOR SIMPLE UNDERSTANDING. An Allegory is a poem, story or picture used to illustrate a hidden or deeper meaning. In rhetorical expression it is common to use both allegories and metaphors to explain the central idea behind a particular concept. In his column, Ali attempted to take me to task for my alleged misunderstanding of the concept of right of first refusal. In his article, he wheeled out his trusty right click function and with the extraordinary use of the cut, copy, and paste function, he recited the literal meaning of Right of First Refusal. He even chose to give us an example. WOW! Remarkable!. The problem is that there is no literal meaning for a term used allegorically. It is simply a tool for expression.

Shockingly, Ali consistently violates the same literal norms that he now accuses me of. Take for example, his misuse of the concept of the Social Contract. The Social Contract theory of the Enlightenment Philosophers is an organized society where people surrender some of their individual liberties to secure protection from the state for the general welfare of society. Ali bastardized this definition to imply that man’s participation in society is directly related to whether he had own “private pussy.” This idea is more Freudian than anything else. Misattribution is what happens when Google is the extent of your scholarship. By the way, it is extremely improbable that Hobbes, Locke, Kant, or Rousseau was ever specifically talking about pussy while ruminating about the relationship between man and the state. But nevertheless, he was granted allegorical license to explain a misattributed, though niggerized idea.

Obsidian’s argument consists of nothing more than static definitions and circular reasoning without the benefit of real life application. It is a pathetic attempt at one upsmanship on a score board where he is about 30 points behind. It is the product of an infantile understanding of relationships between men and women in the dynamic environment of the dating market. It is self-styled mechanical semantics cooked up to appear as legitimate intellectual discourse. Nothing more, Nothing less. It is the result of playing chess with a pigeon. He will just shit on the board and strut around like he won. By the way! Checkmate.NOW ADJOURN YOUR ASS!

TONY MACEO is a senior blogger at the Negromanosphere.com. LIKE, SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE. TILL NEXT TIME, I’LL HOLLA!

Facebook Comments

Black Pigeon Speaks

Frogs, clowns and swastikas
Alt-right

Chuds

Fuentes, Baked Alaska and Evola
Taylor, Molyneux and Spencer
Bannon, Southern and Yiannopoulos
SF, TDS, TRS and /pol/

Rebuilding the Reich, one meme at a time

Buzzwords

v - t - e

Felix Lace,^[1] better known as Black Pigeon Speaks (BPS), is a Canadian Neo-Nazi and YouTube talker and plagiarist who supports pigeons^[2] and even rescues them when they're hurt.^[3] Unfortunately, he also supports alt-right talking points, numerous conspiracy theories, all-capping the same words a ton of times,^[4] and various other bigoted positions (like believing women and immigrants destroy civilization) while presenting them as if they were fact. His statements usually include making bold sweeping claims, establishing ridiculous premises and backing them up with equally ridiculous non sequitur and circular reasoning. He often supports his statements from misleading wingnut sources, showing only their scary headlines while the sources misrepresent studies, cite flawed studies, cite fake studies, or even have body text that contradicts the headlines. Lace previously operated TVShinjuku, a travel channel. Like many other alt-rightists, he is a weeaboo. Probably unlike other alt-righters, he shows decency as an animal lover; his Twitter frequently supports animal care and condemns animal cruelty, though some of the sources for his condemnation are questionable, such as when he cited RT for reporting on animal abuse on a farm owned by a partner of Coca-Cola.^[5]

As of October 2018, Black Pigeon's channel had over 395,000 subscribers and 48 million views,^[6] which is one among countless examples that show you don't need to be educated, honest, or careful about the sources that back up your claims to be profitable when you say things people like to hear. Despite this, Black Pigeon Speaks has been temporarily removed from YouTube on June 13, 2019.^[7]^[8] During the short stint by YouTube, he wrung his hands about free speech, apparently forgetting that he wanted Shaun's videos to be taken off YouTube earlier in February 2018.^[9]

1Views

Views

Women

“”By allowing women to fuck freely, the West has de facto entered into a matriarchy that disincentivizes young men.

—Black Pigeon Speaks who said 'fuck' so hard his mask slipped a little.^[10]

In his sexist video called 'Women DESTROY NATIONS * / CIVILIZATIONS - and other UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTHS' (as all-capping words like 'TRUTH' makes points somehow more correct and coherent) Lace claims that if women, being 'biological creatures', are free from sexual restrictions, they start to form harems and then irreparably damage or even destroy civilizations, and if women are allowed political power, then civilization will inevitably die. These are both ludicrously bold claims. Lace believes that women have not evolved to stay loyal to their 'tribe', and have brought destruction to Western nations by having exercised their voting rights.^[11] His reasoning includes the stereotype that women seek those stronger and more dominating than themselves. He refers to some examples including Japanese women who have married American soldiers and French women who married Nazis, though he fails to take account the context (the Japanese women for instance are living in the aftermath of the atomic bombings), assumes that the men have no agency in these decisions, does not address parallels of men going against their own country, shows lack of self-awareness as he is not living in his own home country, and overall makes a sweeping generalization of women just from the actions of individual women in specific situations.

Besides reasoning that civilizations restricted women's rights historically and therefore civilizations should restrict women's rights, he lists no specific examples of a civilization that has been destroyed by women (because there are no civilizations that have collapsed from a group that has historically no power). He quotes social anthropologist Joseph Daniel Unwin in support of sexual repression. /game-pigeon-eight-ball.html. Unwin has argued that powerful civilizations tend to come with sexual repression. While this argument is oversimplified, Black Pigeon Speaks heavily misrepresents Unwin. Unwin actually heavily criticizes inequality by arguing that women's inequality caused the downfall of monogamy; he is highly pro-immigration (which Black Pigeon Speaks is not); and he advocates sexual repression for both men and women, particularly in the upper class and in positions of power.

Other sources Black Pigeon Speaks includes 'The Primal Male', misrepresenting a Slate article by cropping off its subtitle that contradicts the headlines, and a Legal Insurrection article that misrepresents a BBC article.

Lace does realize that this video can offend women, so he makes a logical clusterfuck of a disclaimer^[12] practically saying his generalizations don't apply to them (why make the generalizations then) and they apply to 'western' women. Women also apparently have no agency in their decisions and it's not their fault they destroy civilizations.

On rape, Lace also claims that 'the vast majority of women, when raped, reach sexual climax or orgasm.'^[11] Lace refers to an MSNBC article citing a study that reported that an estimated 87% of women rape victims reached orgasms while being raped. However, neither the MSNBC article or the scientific study (Shame and Guilt in the Aftermath of Sexual Attack) actually exists.^[13]

Lace also believes that women objectify themselves simply because they love to.^[14]

Transgender

Lace also has a beef with transgender folk, claiming they are mentally ill.^[15]

Race realism

In 'Contrarian Query #1: Systemic Segregation', Lace spends 5 minutes just asking questions about whether alleged low black IQ and high black violence rates (neither premise is backed by reality) might suggest that nation-wide segregation in the United States is necessary. ^[16]

It is quite ironic that he suggests the need for nation-wide segregation in the US on the basis of IQ - the average IQ scores of Asians has been shown to be higher than that of whites. The only conclusion that could be made from his logic is that Asian countries with higher average IQ scores than those of Western countries should implement nation-wide discrimination against all whites living in their countries. Japan is one of these Asian countries. BPS lives in Japan.^[17]

While one can state that that the difference in average IQ scores between Japan and the US is only marginal, the difference in IQ scores between the different races in the US is similarly marginal. There are also ongoing criticisms of the reliability of what IQ scores really measure and how IQ tests are administered and how ultimately applicable IQ scores are. Nevertheless, this extremely small difference is enough for him to propose discrimination against blacks and other races in the US but not propose discrimination against himself.

Banking cartels and mass immigration

See the main articles on this topic: International Jewish Conspiracy and Mass immigration

In 'We're ALL Debt SLAVES - Here's Why', Lace alleges that central bankers are driving mass immigration in order to get more people to loan to:^[18]

So why do governments throughout the Western world speak of the dire horrors that await a country that does not expand its population? With falling population, banks have fewer people to issue debt to and even more difficult for banks is that most throughout the Western world are maxed out on their ability to carry more debt.

[..]

Without an expanding population, banks lose as they have less ability to issue debt that is created out of nothing via fractional reserve banking.

Lace reiterates and expands this claim In 'AUTOMATION will Save Western Economies, NOT Immigration':^[19] He brings up the flagantly racist Great Replacement conspiracy theory to counter his opponents' arguments (which is established in easily-refuted absolutes such as assuming they argue in unconditional favor of open borders) to fearmonger about people and their cultures being 'replaced'.

The political class that are puppets to the [..] banking cartels that fund their campaigns spout that endless numbers of migrants from incompatible cultures are needed, indefinitely, and it’s all for the good of the people of the West.

Leaders from both sides of the political spectrum have now for decades told the citizens of the West that open borders are needed in order to safeguard the welfare state as well as help grow GDP. With never having asked nor received permission, almost without exception every country in the Western world is being flooded with immigration that is having not only a dramatic demographic effect but is transforming the targeted societies.

Many Westerners regurgitate the propaganda and celebrate the vibrant diversity and enrichment that African and Middle Eastern immigration brings. People are told that their countries will not survive without replacing the current majority people and their culture. This script is cloned and rebranded for every nation in the west with the same results. Those that do not celebrate at the altar of multiculturalism are branded heretics, and in the more deluded countries such as Sweden or Canada for example, open opposition to your own displacement and disenfranchisement can have serious consequences, especially but not limited to economic.

Make the lie big. Make it simple. Keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it. We need mass immigration to help offset the economic losses that a declining population will eventually bring.

Fittingly, Lace also believes in many, many conspiracies surrounding George Soros.^[20]^[21]^[22]^[23]^[24] He also believes that most shareholders in the Federal Reserve have ties to the 'Rothschild banking dynasty':^[18]

The Fed is privately owned and its shareholders are private banks. Who those shareholders are is mostly unknown as this information is made as opaque as possible. However, most investigations by independent researchers all point to the Rothschild banking dynasty as being the key prime mover.

Cached

Pseudohistorical nationalism and Holocaust denial

The only real value, topic, or event that is held as sacrosanct and cannot be mocked, joked about, or even questioned, on pain of imprisonment in many countries in Europe, is the Holocaust. Throughout the Western world in its entirety, to question even the details of the Holocaust is to have yourself shun by society and made a social pariah. Just ask Andrew Angelin at the now defunct Daily Stormer. Instead of the sacred being that which is sacred, venerated and mysterious in nature, it is instead the Holocaust, a crime against humanity. Simply put, our new, WWII foundation myth is an extremely negative one, and has poisoned the spirit of Western civilization and has caused it to lose all confidence in itself, its values and even the reason for its very existence. And give it time, will destroy it. Utterly.

In a now-deleted video called 'Does the West HATE itself?',^[25] Black Pigeon Speaks engages in Nazi apologia and pseudohistorical nationalist Western exceptionalism by JAQing off about why people aren't allowed to 'question' the Holocaust. To erase viewers of any doubt he is a Neo-Nazi, he gestures them toward an overtly Neo-Nazi figurehead at the Neo-Nazi Daily Stormer, his example of someone shunned by society for 'questioning' Holocaust. He also believes that the summer of 1914 was really the height of 'Western civilization', never mind income inequality, no safety nets, limited if any social security, no insurance, way less vaccinations, not everyone (such as women but BPS doesn't like women) had the right to vote, and no profitable YouTube videos that spout and validate nationalist fascist apologia. While constructing ideas about Nazis in absolutes (i.e. strawman: 'You learn from a very young age that the ultimate incarnation of pure evil were the Nazis and thus, those that oppose Nazis are the ultimate good.'), he believes the fight against the Axis powers in World War II, the Holocaust in particular, led to a replacement of the foundation myths being that of self-loathing and shame that led to the decline of Western civilization. This is a weird argument that puts too much emphasis on foundation myths influencing society morale and also ignores that right-wing nationalist movements have not declined after World War II (for example, there was the Red Scare, resistance to the Equal Rights Amendment, and Gaullism in France found success.) Additionally, there's no demonstrable case that society morale went down for every country that participated after World War II.

Current politics

Lace is also a supporter of Donald Trump,^[26]Brexit, and Marine Le Pen.^[27] He has also shown dislike towards Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau (whom he always prefaces with 'substitute drama teacher and part-time ski instructor') and German Chancellor Angela Merkel for allowing Syrian refugees to come into their countries.

Conspiracy theories

Lace is also heavy on conspiracy theories. He believes the failed military coup against Erdogan in Turkey was a false flag operated by Erdogan himself (although a lot of western governments believe this as well).^[28] Additionally, he armchair speculates that Hillary Clinton is afflicted with Parkinson's disease (lovely).^[29]

Plagiarism

It turns out that much of the work Lace does is actually just reading the words of other people in a flashy animation. YouTuber Kraut and Tea exposed Black Pigeon Speaks as a plagiarist. ^[30]^[31]^[32] Lace composed his script by cutting and pasting the words of other people together in a single script, and then read those words verbatim.

External links

Black Pigeon Speaks on YouTube
TVShinjuku on YouTube (old channel)
Black Pigeon Speaks on Twitter
Black Pigeon Speaks on Facebook